Debateful

All right, now I'm sure you all heard of that experiment they did on rats which made them live more years and they say in the future, we will have people living up to the age of 200 and since this is prolonging age, the amount of years a woman can become pregnant also lengthens, meaning more children and less deaths, meaning we could have a population disaster.
What are all your thoughts on this?

Argh, why the hell would people want to live so long anyways, I mean friggin 200 years... old wrinkly for 200 years... I would prefer to die at the latest mid 40s (global warming = super hot weather, and I hate hot weather.)

China is already having a population disaster, that's why they have the one child per household thing, and they force women to have abortions. I remembered I read this story about these kids who are not suppose to exist, and they have these population police and *bug your phones

Without things like measles and Black Death, the people are gonna keep reproducing until Earth can't take it anymore; the only moralistic synthetic way to decimate a mass number of people is through war. I really hope World War III starts before the Earth get owned, and hopefully no nukes would be used...

Yeah, but Chinese society is going to collapse BECAUSE of the abortions.
Chinese tradition wants male children, so they kill their children until they get a boy, because men are more productive in the field and factory, help when they get older, etc. etc.
They all do this, and there is an extreme shortage of women in not only China, but in Japan, Germany, and Italy, although not as the same level as China is.
Soon there will be whole generations of just male children in regions of China, with no way to marry and produce offspring.
Soooo that's a big problem for them...

Will prolonging life cause people to continue to wither after the age of 100? If so, wouldn't people suddenly become weaker and depend more on other people to assist them? I know a few people that would rather past away moderately young than old for various reason. Would it be natural to live for 200 years? Some may argue it will be against nature to allow that to happen.

I think all it does is make all your reactions slower in your body. Therefore, if you are like 100 years old, you would probably feel and look like your 50.

In addition,it is pretty stupid, I mean, if that's true, then women can also have birth in a wider gap, for about 60 years...that means more children that can live longer and I think our population is already a little too big...

Why in the world would we want to prolong life?

The earth is already overpopulated, and prolonging life would deplete our resources faster than its present rate of decrease.

Obviously, people are being born faster than people passing away so at one point, overpopulation would cause a lot more people to take awareness. Would prolonging life be beneficial if it won't be able to benefit every single person? For example, a normal 60 year old man would be next to another 60 year old man that has been able to prolong his own life with some sort of formula(?). Would it to be fair to the other person assuming that the 60 year old man that was able to prolong his life looked distinctively younger than the other? Would people be able to estimate the age of a particular person if that were to happen? It would definitely be revolutionary in my life but would it actually do good? How would that look in your opinion?

What happens when the world can no longer sustain life? If there are ten fish and ten fish can feed twenty people, what happens when forty people show up to eat? You either give each person only half of what they need or you only feed twenty and the other twenty die off. The world can only sustain so much before there is nothing left for us. Because of this, I am against prolonging life. Sure, save a life (such as being a doctor), but it's okay for someone to just die from natural causes. There's no reason to try and alter this...Death is inevitable.