I wanted opinions on which one is worse in your views.
Hillary Clinton directly lies about her sniper fire landing in Bosnia.
Or.
Barack Obama having a preacher that says anti-American things which he disavows.
I would have to say the winner of this dubious honor would be Hillary. Obama didn't say the things that nut-job preacher did, but Hillary is DIRECTLY responsible for her own actions.
I agree but to be a devils advocate I think Obama has been running on a platform about his good decision making. Obviously some bad decisions were made concerning his religious practices. As for Hillary ...the same...her platform has been experience but now Obama (and McCain) can claim it's her own dillusions and her record is really as first lady.
Ah, but Obama is also running as a uniter.
If the Dem primary is any indication, he will fail to do this office with as well. Hillary will assuredly mention this before PA.
I see the media turning on Obama, making it more acceptable for Hillary to thieve the nomination from him.
If this happens, the GOP will certainly win.
It's almost impossible for Hillary to win at this point the popular vote. And if they do another McGovern it will only help McCain.
Obama can't help what his preacher says. That is totally out of his control. It is the same as I am in this forum, and Labrocca can say what he will. I can't help that. He will say what he will, and I can choose to stay here or go away. Obama is in the same situation, only he is under a microscope and I am not.
But lying about sniper fire? Oh hell no! I think that is much worse. She really screwed the pooch on that one. That was stupid. Her misstep was a LOT worse.
Purrs,
Pookie