Debateful

Then you can't prove the devil is behind evolution.

It's your job to prove the existence of the devil, not mine.

Written where?

Only if you're okay with losing this debate.

If I didn't get him first. And that depends on if he exists. Which you have not yet proven.

If you can't prove he exists, just come out and say it. No need to be a coward about it.

Why doesn't he use his super powers to escape?

And here I thought you didn't have a sense of humor.

So, he's like the Joker? Or a Bond villian? Completely incompetent when it comes to plans? Then why the worry?

Character from an old cartoon, was also in Harvey Birdman, Attorney at Law as a Judge. He does all sorts of mind swaps. Basically, I was making a small joke out of a bigger one.

I believe the initial post by Spirit claiming that the Devil isn't behind anything must be answered first as he made the statement with no evidence. I in turn posted a question...feel free to provide your proofs...and at such time I will provide mine.

You made the claim to the positive, it is your job to prove it.
That is how it works. Even if it was a question, it was still formed in a way that was claiming the devil was real and behind evolution.

Sorry bout that,

1. Rocks.
2. Rocks are what are gathering the *Darwinists*.
3. Jesus is *The Rock*, of our *Faith*.
4. And guess what, the rock of *The Darwinists* faith is rocks too.
5. Rocks and skeletons.
6. *The Flood* caused massive extinctions, and death.
7. Most bones will never be found, being at the bottom of the oceans.
8. Bones found in plain site on an open field should tell the *Dirt Diggers* something, but it never has.
9. Finding bones of dead animals millions of years old on the surface has no meaning to a closed mind, about *God*.
10. Be it supposed ancestors of man, or dinosaurs, there's always a good reason for it.
11. And yet they refer to a layer of dirt, where they claim is so far down in the earth, etc, that that is the early stage of *LifeTime* on earth, that points to the *Evolution Theory*.
12. And even still they find this layers in the highest mountains, buried in a layer of this same mud or silt.
13. All the while I have given them the clues they need to discern how and why they are out in the open, in today's fields, and hidden on the highest mountain tops, in the Himalayas.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

You talking about fossils? Are you saying they are falsified? Do you have evidence to this?

A man that lived a couple thousand years ago that was regarded as a heretic?

Yep. Science too. All backed up with evidence. Where is yours?

Prove the flood ever happened.

Except most the ocean floor is being mapped by unmanned subs and sonar.
Any bones that may be down there, which won't be many, will be found.

What's that?
And you do realize that most fossils are found far underground, not on the surface. Fossils on the surface would be destroyed by weather.

What do you mean by that?

And that reason is?

Actually, fossils don't do much but show a map of history. What holds the proof for evolution is observations of nature.

Um.... What are you talking about here?

Fossils are rarely found out in the open.

Sorry bout that,


1. This is an interesting site.
2. Buckle up, its going to be a bumpy ride.
3. Try to knock these facts!
4. READ ALL ABOUT IT HERE:http://www.csm.org.uk/expo2.php


"


Fish: Fossil fish have been found in many layers including sandstone, limestone and clay. Again it is hard to imagine how free-swimming fish can be buried slowly when the remains would decay or be eaten by scavengers. Fossil fish are found today in marine sediments, even on top of mountains such as the Himalayas and Alps pointing to rapid burial followed by huge tectonic activity and upheaval.


"

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

How about a reputable source, that has science backing it?

Sorry bout that,


1. But look around man.
2. Lets just think this over for a second.
3. If the mountains were there for millions and millions of years.
4. Then surely they would be grounded smooth.
5. And or all the rivers would be plugged up with boulders
6. Dinosaurs bones wouldn't be on the tops of the highest mountains either.
7. They are.
8. To follow this logic, is more or less following, *Satan*.
9. I wouldn't advise it.
10. Surely most intelligent people wouldn't bet their lives on it, now would they?


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

I already answered your post. It's on the previous page. And it's she, not he.

You're thinking about it the oppose way. The ground was smooth, and then it rose into mountains. The fish you referred to are at the top of those mountains because that land was once underwater.

Yes they would, for the same reason fish are at the top of mountains as well.

That's pretty much being the opposite of logical. It's jumping to conclusions with no proof.

Sorry bout that,

1. *Evolutionianity*, says that all the land was attached, and over millions of years, they drifted apart, creating the world as we see it now, at the same time, killing off the Dinosaurs, which created all the oil under ground, like thats even remotely possible.
2. Where the tectonic plates grind-ed on each other slower than a snail moving, and pushed up the mountains that once were under sea.
3. Oopps, checkmate!
4. Seeing theses lands were the lands, at the begining, how were they thrust up?
5. If they were attached, all one big happy land mass, then how could they've been under water?
6. I bet you still missed the simplicity of numbers 4~5.
7. So this land had to dunk itself under de sea for some time, then get thrust up by the tectonic plates then?


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas