Debateful

Full Version: *Is The Devil Behind Evolution Science?*
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.

chesswarsnow Wrote:
Sorry bout that,


[quote=chesswarsnow]1. But look around man.
2. Lets just think this over for a second.
3. If the mountains were there for millions and millions of years.
4. Then surely they would be grounded smooth.
5. And or all the rivers would be plugged up with boulders
6. Dinosaurs bones wouldn't be on the tops of the highest mountains either.
7. They are.
8. To follow this logic, is more or less following, *Satan*.
9. I wouldn't advise it.
10. Surely most intelligent people wouldn't bet their lives on it, now would they?


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas


Why can't there be bones at the tops of mountains?

chesswarsnow Wrote:
Sorry bout that,

1. *Evolutionianity*, says that all the land was attached, and over millions of years, they drifted apart, creating the world as we see it now, at the same time, killing off the Dinosaurs, which created all the oil under ground, like thats even remotely possible.


Actually what killed the dinosaurs is uncertain. It is believed to have been a comet. And the oil is from plants and other biological matter buried underground.

chesswarsnow Wrote:
2. Where the tectonic plates grind-ed on each other slower than a snail moving, and pushed up the mountains that once were under sea.


Or above.

chesswarsnow Wrote:
3. Oopps, checkmate!


Huh?

chesswarsnow Wrote:
4. Seeing theses lands were the lands, at the begining, how were they thrust up?


What are you getting at? It is unclear. Try being coherent.

chesswarsnow Wrote:
5. If they were attached, all one big happy land mass, then how could they've been under water?


Where does it say they were.

chesswarsnow Wrote:
6. I bet you still missed the simplicity of numbers 4~5.


I think you missed the simplicity of 5th grade science classes.

chesswarsnow Wrote:
7. So this land had to dunk itself under de sea for some time, then get thrust up by the tectonic plates then?


No. Where does it say that?

Sorry bout that,

1. Okay I knew you wouldn't understand.
2. Okay lets say *All* the land was in one place.
3. Like the theory states.
4. If *All* the land is above water, in the begining, having not gone under da sea.
5. And then the land mass split, and never went under da sea.
6. Then how did all those sea creatures get up in dem mountains?
7. Dinosaur bones etc.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

chesswarsnow Wrote:
Sorry bout that,

1. Okay I knew you wouldn't understand.
2. Okay lets say *All* the land was in one place.
3. Like the theory states.
4. If *All* the land is above water, in the begining, having not gone under da sea.
5. And then the land mass split, and never went under da sea.
6. Then how did all those sea creatures get up in dem mountains?
7. Dinosaur bones etc.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas


Probably because the plates shift.
How does creationism explain the fossils?

Saigio Wrote:


Probably because the plates shift.
How does creationism explain the fossils?




1. So you concede you can no longer believe in *Evolutionainity*?


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

chesswarsnow Wrote:
1. *Evolutionianity*, says that all the land was attached, and over millions of years, they drifted apart, creating the world as we see it now, at the same time, killing off the Dinosaurs, which created all the oil under ground, like thats even remotely possible.

How on earth did we get from tectonic plates to dinosaurs? But yes, you're right about how all the land on earth was once attached and it was called Pangaea (sp?). It broke apart into pieces, but those pieces have also crashed into each other creating mountains. India crashed into Asia and created the Himalayas, for example. Other mountains arose from events like this, and some of the peaks of mountains were once underwater. While the land was still underwater, generations of fish were dying on that land and became buried under the sand. The sand rose, the land rose, and the fish bones with it until the mountain formed. I really don't see how the devil plays into any of this.

As far as the dinosaurs becoming extinct from the tectonic plates... that is something I have never heard before. Most scientists believe that it was a comet that killed the dinosaurs, and it was a comet that killed most life during the Precambrian era.

And oil, yes oil comes from fossils once that fossil has been decaying for a very, very, very long time.

Quote:
5. If they were attached, all one big happy land mass, then how could they've been under water?

What's at the bottom in the ocean? Land. It's that land that was thrust up.

Quote:
6. I bet you still missed the simplicity of numbers 4~5.

The simplicity was numbing.

Sorry bout that,



Spirit Wrote:

chesswarsnow Wrote:
1. *Evolutionianity*, says that all the land was attached, and over millions of years, they drifted apart, creating the world as we see it now, at the same time, killing off the Dinosaurs, which created all the oil under ground, like thats even remotely possible.






How on earth did we get from tectonic plates to dinosaurs? But yes, you're right about how all the land on earth was once attached and it was called Pangaea (sp?). It broke apart into pieces, but those pieces have also crashed into each other creating mountains. India crashed into Asia and created the Himalayas, for example. Other mountains arose from events like this, and some of the peaks of mountains were once underwater. While the land was still underwater, generations of fish were dying on that land and became buried under the sand. The sand rose, the land rose, and the fish bones with it until the mountain formed. I really don't see how the devil plays into any of this.

As far as the dinosaurs becoming extinct from the tectonic plates... that is something I have never heard before. Most scientists believe that it was a comet that killed the dinosaurs, and it was a comet that killed most life during the Precambrian era.

And oil, yes oil comes from fossils once that fossil has been decaying for a very, very, very long time.

Quote:
5. If they were attached, all one big happy land mass, then how could they've been under water?

What's at the bottom in the ocean? Land. It's that land that was thrust up.

Quote:
6. I bet you still missed the simplicity of numbers 4~5.

The simplicity was numbing.




1. Tectonic Plates are apart of the whole *Dinosaurs Died And Gave Use Oil, The Land Split Up And Did Bumper Cars, And Humans Came From Monkeys Theory*
2. They all try to support each other.
3. But its flawed.
4. What makes anyone think that a Tectonic Plate can make a mountain?
5. They are just cracks in the Earth, nothing more or less.
6. When the water broke forth from under ground, this is the place where the waters escaped from, end of story.
7. These same crack do nothing now, one side isn't sliding under the other, while they grind on each other.
8. The crack does slip at designated times, which is caused by the gravitational forces more than anything.
9. When it slips we have *Earth Quakes*.
10. We have mountains very far from the Tectonic Plates, this is further proof that my theory is correct.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

So what's your point Sir James?
Faith that you're right,
or faith that you're wrong?

Either way, we all rely on FAITH.
Hoooo Boy
~p

chesswarsnow Wrote:
1. Tectonic Plates are apart of the whole *Dinosaurs Died And Gave Use Oil, The Land Split Up And Did Bumper Cars, And Humans Came From Monkeys Theory*

The tectonic plates had nothing to do with the extinction of the dinosaurs. And evolution does not state humans came from monkeys. Evolution is like a tree. Monkeys are very close to us on the same branch. It's like the letter 'Y'. The right line on the top of the Y is us and the left line on the top of the Y are monkeys (or chimps, rather).

Quote:
4. What makes anyone think that a Tectonic Plate can make a mountain?

Physics. If land is pushing up on another piece of land because of pressure, that pressure is enough to slowly push the land upward over time until the pressure dies down and the plates shift elsewhere.

Quote:
5. They are just cracks in the Earth, nothing more or less.

They move around due to pressure. If they were just cracks in the earth, they would have been filled and smoothed out already. And the thing that causes pressure is the fact that the earth is geologically active.

Quote:
6. When the water broke forth from under ground, this is the place where the waters escaped from, end of story.
7. These same crack do nothing now, one side isn't sliding under the other, while they grind on each other.

I don't know what you're saying here.

Quote:
8. The crack does slip at designated times, which is caused by the gravitational forces more than anything.
9. When it slips we have *Earth Quakes*.

Gravity doesn't make earthquakes. Earthquakes are made the the plates shifting due to pressure from deep within the earth.

Quote:
10. We have mountains very far from the Tectonic Plates, this is further proof that my theory is correct.

The reason we have mountains far away from the tectonic plates causes land to move. If you look at a tectonic plate map, between South America and Africa you will see a fault line that is the perfect shape of the ends of South America and Africa. That fault line is the result of the plates pushing South America and Africa way from each other.

Sorry bout that,

1. Has anyone ever in human history.
2. Seen a mountain being made? (Only Those In The Ark Did)
3. How convenient no one ever has.
4. As long as man has walked this planet, there has never been a mountain thrust up due to tectonic plates.
5. And it never will happen.
6. Things not in motion tend to stay not in motion.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Reference URL's