<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Debateful - All Forums]]></title>
		<link>http://www.debateful.com/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Debateful - http://www.debateful.com]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>MyBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Chile Earthquake 2010]]></title>
			<link>http://www.debateful.com/showthread.php?tid=697</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:39:04 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debateful.com/showthread.php?tid=697</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRyJyuVOwIg" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRyJyuVOwIg</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRyJyuVOwIg" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRyJyuVOwIg</a>]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[House Democrats looking at 'Slaughter Solution' to pass Obamacare, no recorded vote]]></title>
			<link>http://www.debateful.com/showthread.php?tid=696</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:44:50 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debateful.com/showthread.php?tid=696</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[The most ethical congress ever?  The left should be embarrassed to show their faces in public.<br />
<br />
<blockquote><cite>The Washington Examiner Wrote:</cite><a href="http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/House-Democrats-looking-at-Slaughter-Solution-to-pass-Obamacare-without-a-vote-on-Senate-bill-87267402.html#ixzz0hs6ZpQFF" target="_blank">Link</a><br />
<br />
Would House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her fellow House Democratic leaders try to cram the Senate version of Obamacare through the House without actually having a recorded vote on the bill?<br />
<br />
Not only is the answer yes, they would, they have figured out a way to do it, according to National Journal's Congress Daily:<br />
<br />
"House Rules Chairwoman Louise Slaughter is prepping to help usher the healthcare overhaul through the House and potentially avoid a direct vote on the Senate overhaul bill, the chairwoman said Tuesday.<br />
<br />
"Slaughter is weighing preparing a rule that would consider the Senate bill passed once the House approves a corrections bill that would make changes to the Senate version.<br />
<br />
"Slaughter has not taken the plan to Speaker Pelosi as Democrats await CBO scores on the corrections bill. 'Once the CBO gives us the score, we'll spring right on it,' she said."<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/House-Democrats-looking-at-Slaughter-Solution-to-pass-Obamacare-without-a-vote-on-Senate-bill-87267402.html#ixzz0hs6ZpQFF" target="_blank">.: Read the rest of this article :.</a></blockquote>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The most ethical congress ever?  The left should be embarrassed to show their faces in public.<br />
<br />
<blockquote><cite>The Washington Examiner Wrote:</cite><a href="http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/House-Democrats-looking-at-Slaughter-Solution-to-pass-Obamacare-without-a-vote-on-Senate-bill-87267402.html#ixzz0hs6ZpQFF" target="_blank">Link</a><br />
<br />
Would House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her fellow House Democratic leaders try to cram the Senate version of Obamacare through the House without actually having a recorded vote on the bill?<br />
<br />
Not only is the answer yes, they would, they have figured out a way to do it, according to National Journal's Congress Daily:<br />
<br />
"House Rules Chairwoman Louise Slaughter is prepping to help usher the healthcare overhaul through the House and potentially avoid a direct vote on the Senate overhaul bill, the chairwoman said Tuesday.<br />
<br />
"Slaughter is weighing preparing a rule that would consider the Senate bill passed once the House approves a corrections bill that would make changes to the Senate version.<br />
<br />
"Slaughter has not taken the plan to Speaker Pelosi as Democrats await CBO scores on the corrections bill. 'Once the CBO gives us the score, we'll spring right on it,' she said."<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/House-Democrats-looking-at-Slaughter-Solution-to-pass-Obamacare-without-a-vote-on-Senate-bill-87267402.html#ixzz0hs6ZpQFF" target="_blank">.: Read the rest of this article :.</a></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Obama administration will accept no more public input for federal fishery strategy]]></title>
			<link>http://www.debateful.com/showthread.php?tid=695</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:43:36 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debateful.com/showthread.php?tid=695</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Hmm, how many other industries can the misguided actions of an ideologically driven administration attempt to destroy?<br />
<br />
<blockquote><cite>ESPN Wrote:</cite><a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/outdoors/saltwater/news/story?id=4975762" target="_blank">Link</a><br />
<br />
The Obama administration will accept no more public input for a federal strategy that could prohibit U.S. citizens from fishing the nation's oceans, coastal areas, Great Lakes, and even inland waters.<br />
<br />
This announcement comes at the time when the situation supposedly still is "fluid" and the Interagency Ocean Policy Task Force still hasn't issued its final report on zoning uses of these waters.<br />
<br />
That's a disappointment, but not really a surprise for fishing industry insiders who have negotiated for months with officials at the Council on Environmental Quality and bureaucrats on the task force. These angling advocates have come to suspect that public input into the process was a charade from the beginning.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/outdoors/saltwater/news/story?id=4975762" target="_blank">.: Read the rest of this article :.</a></blockquote>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hmm, how many other industries can the misguided actions of an ideologically driven administration attempt to destroy?<br />
<br />
<blockquote><cite>ESPN Wrote:</cite><a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/outdoors/saltwater/news/story?id=4975762" target="_blank">Link</a><br />
<br />
The Obama administration will accept no more public input for a federal strategy that could prohibit U.S. citizens from fishing the nation's oceans, coastal areas, Great Lakes, and even inland waters.<br />
<br />
This announcement comes at the time when the situation supposedly still is "fluid" and the Interagency Ocean Policy Task Force still hasn't issued its final report on zoning uses of these waters.<br />
<br />
That's a disappointment, but not really a surprise for fishing industry insiders who have negotiated for months with officials at the Council on Environmental Quality and bureaucrats on the task force. These angling advocates have come to suspect that public input into the process was a charade from the beginning.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/outdoors/saltwater/news/story?id=4975762" target="_blank">.: Read the rest of this article :.</a></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA["I'm Gonna Punch You In The Head For Jesus"]]></title>
			<link>http://www.debateful.com/showthread.php?tid=694</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:57:29 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debateful.com/showthread.php?tid=694</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHXkkhGDiCQ" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHXkkhGDiCQ</a><br />
<br />
<br />
Who Would Jesus Punch?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHXkkhGDiCQ" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHXkkhGDiCQ</a><br />
<br />
<br />
Who Would Jesus Punch?]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Learning to talk tough]]></title>
			<link>http://www.debateful.com/showthread.php?tid=693</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 13:27:25 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debateful.com/showthread.php?tid=693</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[I think this is hilarious.  I guess this proves what is said about dems  being soft on terrorism. <img src="http://www.debateful.com/images/smilies/madlaugh.gif" style="vertical-align: middle;" border="0" alt="Madlaugh" title="Madlaugh" /><br />
<br />
Dems go to talking-terrorism school <br />
<br />
<br />
House Democrats have found a way to address Republicans’ polling advantage on national security: Teach candidates a better way to talk about the issue. <br />
<br />
<br />
While President Barack Obama still outpolls congressional Republicans on national security, a new Third Way/Greenberg Quinlan Rosner poll out Monday gives the GOP the edge in a generic Republican vs. Democrat matchup on the issue. And the problem is particularly acute for Democratic women: A study to be published in the Journal of Women, Politics &amp; Policy shows support for Democratic women drops 11 percent when public fear of terrorism is high. <br />
<br />
<br />
To combat the problem, House Democrats have asked Third Way, the centrist Democratic think tank, and California Rep. Jane Harman, a leader on intelligence issues in the House, to help lead training sessions on the issue. <br />
<br />
<br />
“The Democratic approach on security — or at least my approach — is that we know how to be tough and smart, not tough and reckless,” said Harman, a Blue Dog whose district is home to an enormous Air Force base and a number of intelligence contractors. “For some Democrats, this is difficult.” <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Read more: <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0310/34045.html#ixzz0hceCmSxD" target="_blank">http://www.politico.com/news/stories/031...z0hceCmSxD</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I think this is hilarious.  I guess this proves what is said about dems  being soft on terrorism. <img src="http://www.debateful.com/images/smilies/madlaugh.gif" style="vertical-align: middle;" border="0" alt="Madlaugh" title="Madlaugh" /><br />
<br />
Dems go to talking-terrorism school <br />
<br />
<br />
House Democrats have found a way to address Republicans’ polling advantage on national security: Teach candidates a better way to talk about the issue. <br />
<br />
<br />
While President Barack Obama still outpolls congressional Republicans on national security, a new Third Way/Greenberg Quinlan Rosner poll out Monday gives the GOP the edge in a generic Republican vs. Democrat matchup on the issue. And the problem is particularly acute for Democratic women: A study to be published in the Journal of Women, Politics &amp; Policy shows support for Democratic women drops 11 percent when public fear of terrorism is high. <br />
<br />
<br />
To combat the problem, House Democrats have asked Third Way, the centrist Democratic think tank, and California Rep. Jane Harman, a leader on intelligence issues in the House, to help lead training sessions on the issue. <br />
<br />
<br />
“The Democratic approach on security — or at least my approach — is that we know how to be tough and smart, not tough and reckless,” said Harman, a Blue Dog whose district is home to an enormous Air Force base and a number of intelligence contractors. “For some Democrats, this is difficult.” <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Read more: <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0310/34045.html#ixzz0hceCmSxD" target="_blank">http://www.politico.com/news/stories/031...z0hceCmSxD</a>]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Nellis Put On Lockdown]]></title>
			<link>http://www.debateful.com/showthread.php?tid=692</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 18:58:00 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debateful.com/showthread.php?tid=692</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[No reason thus far has been given for the lockdown.  It will be interesting to find out just why the base was put on lockdown.  Inquiring minds would like to know.<br />
<br />
Nellis put on lockdown, streets closed near base<br />
By Tiffany Gibson (contact)<br />
<br />
Friday, March 5, 2010 | 5:38 p.m.<br />
<br />
Nellis Air Force Base<br />
Nellis Air Force Base was placed on lockdown this afternoon and nearby streets were closed, authorities said.<br />
<br />
Base spokesman Eugene Hill said the main gate was closed and the base was put on lockdown about 3 p.m. He said Metro Police are assisting, but it is unknown what caused the lockdown.<br />
<br />
Metro spokesman Bill Cassell said officers are assisting with traffic control in the area. He said North Las Vegas Boulevard near East Craig Road has been shut down.<br />
<br />
Traffic is being rerouted and drivers are encouraged to avoid the area.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2010/mar/05/nellis-put-lockdown-streets-closed-near-base/" target="_blank">http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2010/mar...near-base/</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[No reason thus far has been given for the lockdown.  It will be interesting to find out just why the base was put on lockdown.  Inquiring minds would like to know.<br />
<br />
Nellis put on lockdown, streets closed near base<br />
By Tiffany Gibson (contact)<br />
<br />
Friday, March 5, 2010 | 5:38 p.m.<br />
<br />
Nellis Air Force Base<br />
Nellis Air Force Base was placed on lockdown this afternoon and nearby streets were closed, authorities said.<br />
<br />
Base spokesman Eugene Hill said the main gate was closed and the base was put on lockdown about 3 p.m. He said Metro Police are assisting, but it is unknown what caused the lockdown.<br />
<br />
Metro spokesman Bill Cassell said officers are assisting with traffic control in the area. He said North Las Vegas Boulevard near East Craig Road has been shut down.<br />
<br />
Traffic is being rerouted and drivers are encouraged to avoid the area.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2010/mar/05/nellis-put-lockdown-streets-closed-near-base/" target="_blank">http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2010/mar...near-base/</a>]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Hello!]]></title>
			<link>http://www.debateful.com/showthread.php?tid=691</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 13:04:36 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debateful.com/showthread.php?tid=691</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Just stumbled across this site and thought I'd check it out. I've been a regular on Argue With Everyone, US Messageboard, and several other sites.<br />
<br />
Anyway, "HEY"!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Just stumbled across this site and thought I'd check it out. I've been a regular on Argue With Everyone, US Messageboard, and several other sites.<br />
<br />
Anyway, "HEY"!!]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Illinois stuck in a ‘historic, epic’ budget crisis]]></title>
			<link>http://www.debateful.com/showthread.php?tid=690</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 10:36:24 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debateful.com/showthread.php?tid=690</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Wow, I can scarecely imagine how Chicago expected to host an Olympics with this kind of debt looming....<br />
<br />
<blockquote><cite>Chicago Tribune Wrote:</cite><a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/ct-met-state-budget-mess-20100223,0,7172195.story" target="_blank">Link</a><br />
<br />
Illinois government is staring down the barrel of an explosive financial mess, and perhaps nothing frames the danger better than two big numbers.<br />
<br />
The first is &#36;26 billion, the grand total that lawmakers have allotted this year for the meat of what the state does: funding education, health care, child welfare, public safety and the machinery of government itself.<br />
<br />
The second number is &#36;13 billion, the total of red ink in the state's main checking account that, by law, has to be erased — at least on paper — before a penny can be set aside for day-to-day operations in the fiscal year, which begins July 1.<br />
<br />
In short, the deficit is half as big as the core of the state budget.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/ct-met-state-budget-mess-20100223,0,7172195.story" target="_blank">.: Read the rest of this article :.</a></blockquote>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Wow, I can scarecely imagine how Chicago expected to host an Olympics with this kind of debt looming....<br />
<br />
<blockquote><cite>Chicago Tribune Wrote:</cite><a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/ct-met-state-budget-mess-20100223,0,7172195.story" target="_blank">Link</a><br />
<br />
Illinois government is staring down the barrel of an explosive financial mess, and perhaps nothing frames the danger better than two big numbers.<br />
<br />
The first is &#36;26 billion, the grand total that lawmakers have allotted this year for the meat of what the state does: funding education, health care, child welfare, public safety and the machinery of government itself.<br />
<br />
The second number is &#36;13 billion, the total of red ink in the state's main checking account that, by law, has to be erased — at least on paper — before a penny can be set aside for day-to-day operations in the fiscal year, which begins July 1.<br />
<br />
In short, the deficit is half as big as the core of the state budget.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/ct-met-state-budget-mess-20100223,0,7172195.story" target="_blank">.: Read the rest of this article :.</a></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Working the Teleprompter.]]></title>
			<link>http://www.debateful.com/showthread.php?tid=689</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 09:06:34 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debateful.com/showthread.php?tid=689</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://usera.ImageCave.com/Shooterman/urinal_prompter.jpg" border="0" alt="[Image: urinal_prompter.jpg&#93;" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="http://usera.ImageCave.com/Shooterman/urinal_prompter.jpg" border="0" alt="[Image: urinal_prompter.jpg]" />]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[CNN Poll: Majority says government a threat to citizens' rights]]></title>
			<link>http://www.debateful.com/showthread.php?tid=688</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 08:40:58 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debateful.com/showthread.php?tid=688</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[WOW, just WOW.<br />
<br />
<blockquote><cite>CNN.com Wrote:</cite><a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/02/26/cnn-poll-majority-says-government-a-threat-to-citizens-rights/?fbid=OA6vYus7V6u" target="_blank">Link</a><br />
<br />
Washington (CNN) – A majority of Americans think the federal government poses a threat to rights of Americans, according to a new national poll.<br />
<br />
Fifty-six percent of people questioned in a CNN/Opinion Research Corporation survey released Friday say they think the federal government's become so large and powerful that it poses an immediate threat to the rights and freedoms of ordinary citizens. Forty-four percent of those polled disagree.<br />
<br />
The survey indicates a partisan divide on the question: only 37 percent of Democrats, 63 percent of Independents and nearly 7 in 10 Republicans say the federal government poses a threat to the rights of Americans.<br />
<br />
According to CNN poll numbers released Sunday, Americans overwhelmingly think that the U.S. government is broken - though the public overwhelmingly holds out hope that what's broken can be fixed.<br />
<br />
The CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll was conducted February 12-15, with 1,023 adult Americans questioned by telephone. The survey's sampling error is plus or minus 3 percentage points for the overall survey.</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[WOW, just WOW.<br />
<br />
<blockquote><cite>CNN.com Wrote:</cite><a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/02/26/cnn-poll-majority-says-government-a-threat-to-citizens-rights/?fbid=OA6vYus7V6u" target="_blank">Link</a><br />
<br />
Washington (CNN) – A majority of Americans think the federal government poses a threat to rights of Americans, according to a new national poll.<br />
<br />
Fifty-six percent of people questioned in a CNN/Opinion Research Corporation survey released Friday say they think the federal government's become so large and powerful that it poses an immediate threat to the rights and freedoms of ordinary citizens. Forty-four percent of those polled disagree.<br />
<br />
The survey indicates a partisan divide on the question: only 37 percent of Democrats, 63 percent of Independents and nearly 7 in 10 Republicans say the federal government poses a threat to the rights of Americans.<br />
<br />
According to CNN poll numbers released Sunday, Americans overwhelmingly think that the U.S. government is broken - though the public overwhelmingly holds out hope that what's broken can be fixed.<br />
<br />
The CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll was conducted February 12-15, with 1,023 adult Americans questioned by telephone. The survey's sampling error is plus or minus 3 percentage points for the overall survey.</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Hey!Hey!Hey!]]></title>
			<link>http://www.debateful.com/showthread.php?tid=687</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:56:34 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debateful.com/showthread.php?tid=687</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Hey fellows!<br />
My name is Serge Vikhrev and I am in California.:)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hey fellows!<br />
My name is Serge Vikhrev and I am in California.:)]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Incredible, Vanishing Greenback]]></title>
			<link>http://www.debateful.com/showthread.php?tid=686</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:24:31 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debateful.com/showthread.php?tid=686</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Should be a must read for all.<br />
<br />
excerpt<br />
<br />
The cyclical nature of life is reassuring. We are less afraid of the privations of winter because we’re assured the spring will come again.<br />
<br />
Similarly, those who claim expertise in such matters — those currently encouraging us to buy stocks and government bonds, for example — insist that the market always comes back. Given a little time, everything will be the same as it was.<br />
<br />
Because this is reassuring, we cross our fingers and hope they’re right. But they’re wrong. Not the assertion that some specific companies and stock issues will again prosper and that some people will again grow rich. Of course there will always be “winners” — especially when government bestows on itself the power to choose who shall (their rich friends) and who shall not (you) be “bailed out.” No: I refer to the part about “things being the same.”<br />
<br />
A cartel of private bankers was given control over our money in 1913, in defiance of the wisdom of Andy Jackson and Martin Van Buren. Frank “Pal of Stalin” Roosevelt ended the convertibility — heck, the private ownership — of gold in 1933. But everything was fine again in the 1950s and ‘60s, right? Then, after the ongoing devaluation of the dollar by the Federal Reserve forced Lyndon Johnson to also end the convertibility of paper dollars into silver in 1964, we had some tough times in the 1970s, but everything came roaring back in the ’80s and ’90s … right?<br />
<br />
Actually, we were lucky that the adoption of new technologies like the cell phone and the personal computer generated new industries and new jobs, helping to replace (and disguise the eclipse of) the old industrial giants: coal, steel, railroads and automobiles. (Note that the declining industries were systematically crippled by the innovation-suppression teams known as “unions”; the fast-rising replacements were not.)<br />
<br />
Still, everything was not the same. The vastly greater looting of our paychecks through taxation and regulation after 1964 meant that, where prior to 1960 a single blue-collar wage could support an American middle-class family in a free-standing house, after 1970 it took two incomes — husband and wife — to do that. The hidden but vast social cost of this new arrangement was that the schooling and nurturing of children was now turned over almost entirely to unionized government propaganda officers. The arrogance, the illiteracy and innumeracy, the knee-jerk collectivism and presumption that government can and must step in to solve every problem exhibited by the resulting generation-and-a-half has set the stage for the final decline not just of America, but of virtually all the remaining mighty nation states of the 19th and 20th centuries.<br />
<br />
The ruling elite in Washington is going to try to inflate its way out of its debt conundrum, attempting to pay off the government’s foreign creditors with greenbacks which lose value right before your eyes, like an ice cream cone melting on a hot summer day. The process is already well underway. If gasoline used to cost 28 cents a gallon and now costs &#36;2.80, then a dollar is now worth a dime. If you could once buy a silver dollar for one greenback but it now costs 15 greenbacks, then the paper dollar is now worth seven 1960 cents. If gold once cost &#36;35 an ounce and it now costs &#36;1,100 an ounce, than the greenback is now worth about three 1940 pennies.<br />
<br />
Americans are told we have too low a savings rate. What are we supposed to save: greenbacks, matchbooks, or Wheaties boxtops? It’s a toss-up which will be worth less in five years.<br />
<br />
What are the new technologies that will spark the next American economic renaissance? Not those subsidized by government — they’re losers by definition. Rather, look precisely to those that can escape the crushing mailed fist of the tax man and the regulator.<br />
<br />
Read the rest.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.vinsuprynowicz.com/?p=449#more-449" target="_blank">http://www.vinsuprynowicz.com/?p=449#more-449</a><br />
<br />
Another reason I really like Vin Suprynowicz and his writings.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Should be a must read for all.<br />
<br />
excerpt<br />
<br />
The cyclical nature of life is reassuring. We are less afraid of the privations of winter because we’re assured the spring will come again.<br />
<br />
Similarly, those who claim expertise in such matters — those currently encouraging us to buy stocks and government bonds, for example — insist that the market always comes back. Given a little time, everything will be the same as it was.<br />
<br />
Because this is reassuring, we cross our fingers and hope they’re right. But they’re wrong. Not the assertion that some specific companies and stock issues will again prosper and that some people will again grow rich. Of course there will always be “winners” — especially when government bestows on itself the power to choose who shall (their rich friends) and who shall not (you) be “bailed out.” No: I refer to the part about “things being the same.”<br />
<br />
A cartel of private bankers was given control over our money in 1913, in defiance of the wisdom of Andy Jackson and Martin Van Buren. Frank “Pal of Stalin” Roosevelt ended the convertibility — heck, the private ownership — of gold in 1933. But everything was fine again in the 1950s and ‘60s, right? Then, after the ongoing devaluation of the dollar by the Federal Reserve forced Lyndon Johnson to also end the convertibility of paper dollars into silver in 1964, we had some tough times in the 1970s, but everything came roaring back in the ’80s and ’90s … right?<br />
<br />
Actually, we were lucky that the adoption of new technologies like the cell phone and the personal computer generated new industries and new jobs, helping to replace (and disguise the eclipse of) the old industrial giants: coal, steel, railroads and automobiles. (Note that the declining industries were systematically crippled by the innovation-suppression teams known as “unions”; the fast-rising replacements were not.)<br />
<br />
Still, everything was not the same. The vastly greater looting of our paychecks through taxation and regulation after 1964 meant that, where prior to 1960 a single blue-collar wage could support an American middle-class family in a free-standing house, after 1970 it took two incomes — husband and wife — to do that. The hidden but vast social cost of this new arrangement was that the schooling and nurturing of children was now turned over almost entirely to unionized government propaganda officers. The arrogance, the illiteracy and innumeracy, the knee-jerk collectivism and presumption that government can and must step in to solve every problem exhibited by the resulting generation-and-a-half has set the stage for the final decline not just of America, but of virtually all the remaining mighty nation states of the 19th and 20th centuries.<br />
<br />
The ruling elite in Washington is going to try to inflate its way out of its debt conundrum, attempting to pay off the government’s foreign creditors with greenbacks which lose value right before your eyes, like an ice cream cone melting on a hot summer day. The process is already well underway. If gasoline used to cost 28 cents a gallon and now costs &#36;2.80, then a dollar is now worth a dime. If you could once buy a silver dollar for one greenback but it now costs 15 greenbacks, then the paper dollar is now worth seven 1960 cents. If gold once cost &#36;35 an ounce and it now costs &#36;1,100 an ounce, than the greenback is now worth about three 1940 pennies.<br />
<br />
Americans are told we have too low a savings rate. What are we supposed to save: greenbacks, matchbooks, or Wheaties boxtops? It’s a toss-up which will be worth less in five years.<br />
<br />
What are the new technologies that will spark the next American economic renaissance? Not those subsidized by government — they’re losers by definition. Rather, look precisely to those that can escape the crushing mailed fist of the tax man and the regulator.<br />
<br />
Read the rest.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.vinsuprynowicz.com/?p=449#more-449" target="_blank">http://www.vinsuprynowicz.com/?p=449#more-449</a><br />
<br />
Another reason I really like Vin Suprynowicz and his writings.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Obama &#x26; Dems in 2005: 51 Vote ‘Nuclear Option’ Is ‘Arrogant’ Power Grab]]></title>
			<link>http://www.debateful.com/showthread.php?tid=685</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:37:37 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debateful.com/showthread.php?tid=685</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.breitbart.tv/obama-dems-in-2005-51-vote-nuclear-option-is-arrogant-power-grab-against-the-founders-intent/" target="_blank">It appears that hypocrisy knows absolutely no bounds</a>.<br />
<br />
Joe Biden said "<span style="font-style: italic;">I pray God when the Democrats take back control we don't make the kind of naked power grab you are doing</span>."<br />
<br />
I guess when it is The One calling for the "arrogant power grab against the founder's intent" it is OK.<br />
<br />
<img src="http://www.debateful.com/images/smilies/dizzy.gif" style="vertical-align: middle;" border="0" alt="Dizzy" title="Dizzy" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.breitbart.tv/obama-dems-in-2005-51-vote-nuclear-option-is-arrogant-power-grab-against-the-founders-intent/" target="_blank">It appears that hypocrisy knows absolutely no bounds</a>.<br />
<br />
Joe Biden said "<span style="font-style: italic;">I pray God when the Democrats take back control we don't make the kind of naked power grab you are doing</span>."<br />
<br />
I guess when it is The One calling for the "arrogant power grab against the founder's intent" it is OK.<br />
<br />
<img src="http://www.debateful.com/images/smilies/dizzy.gif" style="vertical-align: middle;" border="0" alt="Dizzy" title="Dizzy" />]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[White House Does a Big No No]]></title>
			<link>http://www.debateful.com/showthread.php?tid=684</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:14:34 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debateful.com/showthread.php?tid=684</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<span style="font-weight: bold;">Who thinks that the MSM will pick up on this?  Personally if I were a betting person, I wouldn't bet the farm on them giving it a second glance. </span><br />
<br />
<br />
White House Accused of Federal Crime in Specter, Bennet Races<br />
By Jeffrey Lord on 2.22.10 @ 6:09AM<br />
<br />
"Whoever solicits or receives … any….thing of value, in consideration of the promise of support or use of influence in obtaining for any person any appointive office or place under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both." -- 18 USC Sec. 211 -- Bribery, Graft and Conflicts of Interest: Acceptance or solicitation to obtain appointive public office <br />
<br />
 "In the face of a White House denial, U.S. Rep. Joe Sestak stuck to his story yesterday that the Obama administration offered him a "high-ranking" government post if he would not run against U.S. Sen. Arlen Specter in Pennsylvania's Democratic primary."<br />
-- Philadelphia Inquirer<br />
February 19, 2010 <br />
<br />
"D.C. job alleged as attempt to deter Romanoff"<br />
--Denver Post<br />
September 27, 2009 <br />
<br />
A bombshell has just exploded in the 2010 elections. <br />
<br />
For the second time in five months, the Obama White House is being accused -- by Democrats -- of offering high ranking government jobs in return for political favors. What no one is reporting is that this is a violation of federal law that can lead to prison time, a fine or both, according to Title 18, Chapter 11, Section 211 of the United States Code<br />
<br />
The jobs in question? Secretary of the Navy and a position within the U.S. Agency for International Development. <br />
<br />
The favor requested in return? Withdrawal from Senate challenges to two sitting United States Senators, both Democrats supported by President Obama. The Senators are Arlen Specter in Pennsylvania and Michael Bennet in Colorado. <br />
<br />
Snip: Read more at the link.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://spectator.org/archives/2010/02/22/specter-race-scandal-sestak-ac" target="_blank">http://spectator.org/archives/2010/02/22...-sestak-ac</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<span style="font-weight: bold;">Who thinks that the MSM will pick up on this?  Personally if I were a betting person, I wouldn't bet the farm on them giving it a second glance. </span><br />
<br />
<br />
White House Accused of Federal Crime in Specter, Bennet Races<br />
By Jeffrey Lord on 2.22.10 @ 6:09AM<br />
<br />
"Whoever solicits or receives … any….thing of value, in consideration of the promise of support or use of influence in obtaining for any person any appointive office or place under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both." -- 18 USC Sec. 211 -- Bribery, Graft and Conflicts of Interest: Acceptance or solicitation to obtain appointive public office <br />
<br />
 "In the face of a White House denial, U.S. Rep. Joe Sestak stuck to his story yesterday that the Obama administration offered him a "high-ranking" government post if he would not run against U.S. Sen. Arlen Specter in Pennsylvania's Democratic primary."<br />
-- Philadelphia Inquirer<br />
February 19, 2010 <br />
<br />
"D.C. job alleged as attempt to deter Romanoff"<br />
--Denver Post<br />
September 27, 2009 <br />
<br />
A bombshell has just exploded in the 2010 elections. <br />
<br />
For the second time in five months, the Obama White House is being accused -- by Democrats -- of offering high ranking government jobs in return for political favors. What no one is reporting is that this is a violation of federal law that can lead to prison time, a fine or both, according to Title 18, Chapter 11, Section 211 of the United States Code<br />
<br />
The jobs in question? Secretary of the Navy and a position within the U.S. Agency for International Development. <br />
<br />
The favor requested in return? Withdrawal from Senate challenges to two sitting United States Senators, both Democrats supported by President Obama. The Senators are Arlen Specter in Pennsylvania and Michael Bennet in Colorado. <br />
<br />
Snip: Read more at the link.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://spectator.org/archives/2010/02/22/specter-race-scandal-sestak-ac" target="_blank">http://spectator.org/archives/2010/02/22...-sestak-ac</a>]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Fox Airing Toyota Issues On Capital Hill]]></title>
			<link>http://www.debateful.com/showthread.php?tid=683</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:04:16 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debateful.com/showthread.php?tid=683</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Here's the link, it's ongoing and Toyota, so far, is getting a major tongue-lashing and being asked the hard questions.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://interactive.foxnews.com/livestream/live.html?chanId=5" target="_blank">http://interactive.foxnews.com/livestrea...l?chanId=5</a><br />
<br />
Interesting.<br />
Purrs,<br />
Pookie]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Here's the link, it's ongoing and Toyota, so far, is getting a major tongue-lashing and being asked the hard questions.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://interactive.foxnews.com/livestream/live.html?chanId=5" target="_blank">http://interactive.foxnews.com/livestrea...l?chanId=5</a><br />
<br />
Interesting.<br />
Purrs,<br />
Pookie]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[CNN Website Freezing]]></title>
			<link>http://www.debateful.com/showthread.php?tid=682</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:31:10 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debateful.com/showthread.php?tid=682</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Something is wrong with CNN, so please don't click on ANY of my CNN links until they get their tails fixed. It's too frustrating. I'm using Fox and ABC and -- yes, the BBC for now.<br />
Updates on our former Vice President Mr. Cheney is being covered well by Fox. Just stay away from CNN for the time being.<br />
Thanks! I don't want y'all to get annoyed.<br />
Purrs,<br />
Pookie]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Something is wrong with CNN, so please don't click on ANY of my CNN links until they get their tails fixed. It's too frustrating. I'm using Fox and ABC and -- yes, the BBC for now.<br />
Updates on our former Vice President Mr. Cheney is being covered well by Fox. Just stay away from CNN for the time being.<br />
Thanks! I don't want y'all to get annoyed.<br />
Purrs,<br />
Pookie]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Danggit -- Cheney hospitalized with chest pains, staff says]]></title>
			<link>http://www.debateful.com/showthread.php?tid=681</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:37:02 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debateful.com/showthread.php?tid=681</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[I really do NOT like this. We are praying for him. Hell, he has been through enough already!<br />
<br />
Washington (CNN) -- Former Vice President [censored&#93; Cheney was hospitalized Monday with chest pains, according to his office.<br />
<br />
Cheney, 69, is resting comfortably at George Washington University Hospital, and his doctors are evaluating the situation, his staff said in a statement.<br />
<br />
A family source told CNN that Cheney will be kept in the hospital overnight for observation and additional tests. Another source said Cheney is up and in touch with his family and friends.<br />
<br />
CNN's chief medical correspondent Sanjay Gupta called Cheney's mobility "a good sign."<br />
<br />
I hope he's going to be okay. Geez, enough is enough for him, I think. He has been through so much.<br />
Read more here: <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/02/22/cheney.hospitalized/index.html?hpt=T2" target="_blank">http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/02/22/c...tml?hpt=T2</a><br />
<br />
Let's hope and pray he will be okay. His prognosis looks good so far, let's hope and pray he'll get out of the hospital and back on his feet in very short time.<br />
God bless you, Mr. Cheney. <br />
Purrs,<br />
A Worried Cat Person]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I really do NOT like this. We are praying for him. Hell, he has been through enough already!<br />
<br />
Washington (CNN) -- Former Vice President [censored] Cheney was hospitalized Monday with chest pains, according to his office.<br />
<br />
Cheney, 69, is resting comfortably at George Washington University Hospital, and his doctors are evaluating the situation, his staff said in a statement.<br />
<br />
A family source told CNN that Cheney will be kept in the hospital overnight for observation and additional tests. Another source said Cheney is up and in touch with his family and friends.<br />
<br />
CNN's chief medical correspondent Sanjay Gupta called Cheney's mobility "a good sign."<br />
<br />
I hope he's going to be okay. Geez, enough is enough for him, I think. He has been through so much.<br />
Read more here: <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/02/22/cheney.hospitalized/index.html?hpt=T2" target="_blank">http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/02/22/c...tml?hpt=T2</a><br />
<br />
Let's hope and pray he will be okay. His prognosis looks good so far, let's hope and pray he'll get out of the hospital and back on his feet in very short time.<br />
God bless you, Mr. Cheney. <br />
Purrs,<br />
A Worried Cat Person]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[CNN Poll: 69% OK with gays in the military]]></title>
			<link>http://www.debateful.com/showthread.php?tid=679</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:11:22 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debateful.com/showthread.php?tid=679</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[From CNN Deputy Political Director Paul Steinhauser<br />
<br />
Washington (CNN) - Nearly seven in ten Americans think that people who are openly gay or lesbian should be allowed to serve in the military, according to a new national poll.<br />
<br />
A CNN/Opinion Research Corporation survey indicates that 69 percent of the public favors allowing openly gay men and lesbian women to serve in the military, with 27 percent opposed.<br />
<br />
Full results [PDF&#93;<br />
<br />
"That's a dramatic turnaround from the early 1990s, when the 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' policy was first being implemented," says CNN Polling Director Keating Holland. "In 1994, only a bare 53 percent majority felt that gays and lesbians should be allowed to openly serve in the military."<br />
<br />
Check this out: <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/02/22/cnn-poll-69-ok-with-gays-in-the-military/?fbid=mi1kBu-ThCH" target="_blank">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/201...i1kBu-ThCH</a><br />
<br />
I served with gays. I didn't give a damn what they were or their preferences, as a commander, I wanted to know if they could do the job and of course they can, without doubt.<br />
Purrs,<br />
Pookie]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[From CNN Deputy Political Director Paul Steinhauser<br />
<br />
Washington (CNN) - Nearly seven in ten Americans think that people who are openly gay or lesbian should be allowed to serve in the military, according to a new national poll.<br />
<br />
A CNN/Opinion Research Corporation survey indicates that 69 percent of the public favors allowing openly gay men and lesbian women to serve in the military, with 27 percent opposed.<br />
<br />
Full results [PDF]<br />
<br />
"That's a dramatic turnaround from the early 1990s, when the 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' policy was first being implemented," says CNN Polling Director Keating Holland. "In 1994, only a bare 53 percent majority felt that gays and lesbians should be allowed to openly serve in the military."<br />
<br />
Check this out: <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/02/22/cnn-poll-69-ok-with-gays-in-the-military/?fbid=mi1kBu-ThCH" target="_blank">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/201...i1kBu-ThCH</a><br />
<br />
I served with gays. I didn't give a damn what they were or their preferences, as a commander, I wanted to know if they could do the job and of course they can, without doubt.<br />
Purrs,<br />
Pookie]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Najibullah Zazi pleads guilty in New York terrorism plot]]></title>
			<link>http://www.debateful.com/showthread.php?tid=678</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:36:25 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debateful.com/showthread.php?tid=678</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[NEW YORK (CNN) -- Terrorism suspect Najibullah Zazi pleaded guilty Monday to conspiring to detonate explosives in the United States.<br />
<br />
In an appearance before a federal judge, Zazi, a native of Afghanistan who lived in Colorado, admitted his role in the conspiracy, saying, "In spring 2008, I conspired with others to join the Taliban, to fight along with the Taliban against the United States."<br />
<br />
"We were recruited to al Qaeda instead," he said.<br />
<br />
Read more: <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/02/22/najibullah.zazi.plea/index.html?hpt=T1" target="_blank">http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/02/22/naji...tml?hpt=T1</a><br />
<br />
I hope he gets put away for the rest of his life. The death penalty would be too good for him, as he would die as a martyr. Bah!<br />
Purrs,<br />
Pookie]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[NEW YORK (CNN) -- Terrorism suspect Najibullah Zazi pleaded guilty Monday to conspiring to detonate explosives in the United States.<br />
<br />
In an appearance before a federal judge, Zazi, a native of Afghanistan who lived in Colorado, admitted his role in the conspiracy, saying, "In spring 2008, I conspired with others to join the Taliban, to fight along with the Taliban against the United States."<br />
<br />
"We were recruited to al Qaeda instead," he said.<br />
<br />
Read more: <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/02/22/najibullah.zazi.plea/index.html?hpt=T1" target="_blank">http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/02/22/naji...tml?hpt=T1</a><br />
<br />
I hope he gets put away for the rest of his life. The death penalty would be too good for him, as he would die as a martyr. Bah!<br />
Purrs,<br />
Pookie]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Afghanistan's Curse: Opium]]></title>
			<link>http://www.debateful.com/showthread.php?tid=677</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:56:55 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debateful.com/showthread.php?tid=677</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[With a loud "whoosh" and a blast of hot air, the pile of tires, wood and 2.5 tons of raw opium burst into flames. <br />
<br />
It's a government-sponsored "drug burn" in the western Afghan city of Herat, an event intended to reinforce the government’s claim that it is moving aggressively against the opium trade.<br />
<br />
<br />
We flew early Sunday morning from Kabul to Herat to witness the event with Afghanistan's Deputy Minister for Combating Narcotics, Daoud Daoud.<br />
<br />
The drug burn was dramatic, but the nearly 5,000 pounds of opium is just a tiny fraction of the 6,900 tons  - or nearly 14 million pounds - produced last year in Afghanistan, according to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. The acreage planted with opium has reportedly decreased over the last two years, but productivity per acre has increased.<br />
<br />
Read more: <a href="http://afghanistan.blogs.cnn.com/2010/02/22/afghanistans-curse-opium/?hpt=C1" target="_blank">http://afghanistan.blogs.cnn.com/2010/02...um/?hpt=C1</a><br />
<br />
Seems to be a blog I ran into but dang! This is not good.<br />
Purrs,<br />
Pookie]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[With a loud "whoosh" and a blast of hot air, the pile of tires, wood and 2.5 tons of raw opium burst into flames. <br />
<br />
It's a government-sponsored "drug burn" in the western Afghan city of Herat, an event intended to reinforce the government’s claim that it is moving aggressively against the opium trade.<br />
<br />
<br />
We flew early Sunday morning from Kabul to Herat to witness the event with Afghanistan's Deputy Minister for Combating Narcotics, Daoud Daoud.<br />
<br />
The drug burn was dramatic, but the nearly 5,000 pounds of opium is just a tiny fraction of the 6,900 tons  - or nearly 14 million pounds - produced last year in Afghanistan, according to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. The acreage planted with opium has reportedly decreased over the last two years, but productivity per acre has increased.<br />
<br />
Read more: <a href="http://afghanistan.blogs.cnn.com/2010/02/22/afghanistans-curse-opium/?hpt=C1" target="_blank">http://afghanistan.blogs.cnn.com/2010/02...um/?hpt=C1</a><br />
<br />
Seems to be a blog I ran into but dang! This is not good.<br />
Purrs,<br />
Pookie]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>